“To merge or not merge” that is the question – well it is at least a question that most charities ask at some point in their development as they look to the future and how best to achieve their charitable purposes.

“Mergers” can take many forms: collaborative working, an asset transfer from one charity to another, the creation of a new charity, joining a group of companies as a subsidiary etc. The right format for the merger will depend on the parties involved, the reasons for the merger and the aims of the merger.  However, key to every merger are the people. You can never underestimate the importance of communication and relationships. Charities are, after all, made up of individuals who are often passionate about “their” charity. It can become personal when a merger involves a name change, a new logo, a different focus. The success of a merger rarely depends on the legal structure but always depends on the time spent building relationships, communicating, creating a shared ethos, vision and a way of working that respects each charity’s history and USP. 

However, (as any good lawyer would say!) there can also be legal challenges on a merger, some of which were highlighted in the Law Commission Report: Technical Issues in Charity law published last year. These challenges include:-

  • the legal structure to use: contractual, a new charity, the transfer of assets from one charity to the other’ becoming a subsidiary etc.;
  • can a Pre-Merging Declaration be used to transfer a charity’s property;
  • whether registering the merger on the Charity Commission’s Register of Mergers will ensure that all legacies left to a closing charity pass to the “merged” charity. (The Law Commission has recommended reforms to the Charities Act 2011 to ensure this is the case, as case law has shown that it will not always be so); and
  • what happens to permanent endowment? How will this be held as it cannot become the property of a corporate charity, such as a charitable company?  Instead, it has to continue to be held on its permanent endowment trusts, perhaps with the corporate charity becoming the sole trustee.  In addition, any sole trustee of permanent endowment property has to have “trust corporation status”.  The Law Commission identified the difficulty of obtaining this (it can invoke an application to the Lord Chancellor) and has recommended the process is simplified.

But mergers can, ultimately, lead to new creative ways of working and whilst the journey there might be bumpy the hope is that it will lead to a brighter future for all the charities involved.

Further information

If you would like any more information about mergers, please contact Edwina Turner.

Contract management pitfalls
Contract management pitfalls

Social housing providers will routinely have a number of construction projects underway at any one time. It is essential for client teams to understand and avoid key contract management pitfalls.

Promotions May 2019
Promotions May 2019

Following our new partner announcement, it is with great pleasure that we can announce additional promotions.

Refusing to follow instructions
Refusing to follow instructions

Even those of us with zero football knowledge will most likely know of the shenanigans at a Chelsea FC game this season.

Employment status... where are we?
Employment status... where are we?

The gig economy, the tensions between it, and our more established ways of working are rarely far from the news these days.

Compensatory rest – equivalent not identical
Compensatory rest – equivalent not identical

The case of Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd v Crawford [2019] EWCA Civil 269 will not win awards for excitement but is useful guidance when dealing with workers’ rest periods under the WTR 1998.

Brexit...of course
Brexit...of course

Non-UK nationals will surely be worried about an uncertain future, with much still unclear. These feelings will inevitably accompany people to work, and so employers need to be prepared.