In the first of a series, this article examines the impact of the Derby case on how local authorities should apply and charities can claim business rate relief.
The largely unexpected fire-safety risks identified following the Grenfell Tower disaster have exerted significant pressure on social housing budgets.
Providers now face an increasing list of fire-safety issues, as investigations into further products and systems continue.
Put simply, the need for innovative support to address these issues has never been greater.
Poor fire compartmentation, defective sprinkler systems, faulty fire doors, use of combustible material in balconies and risks around cladding materials (both Aluminium Composite Material (ACM) and High-Pressure Laminates); these represent a number of key issues.
A sector-wide concern is how to balance safety with financial stability?
The G15 group of social housing providers already estimate costs of up to £6.87bn to make their buildings fire safe.
The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government provided £400m to help eligible registered providers replace ACM cladding, but no funding has yet been made available for addressing wider fire-safety issues.
There are, however, strategies available for providers wishing to avoid lengthy litigation processes and instead focus on the delivery of remedial works, prioritising resident safety.
Contractors frequently deny responsibility for fire-safety defects, stalling remedial works.
To address this, providers can adopt a ‘piecemeal’ approach by adjudicating only the question of liability.
Adjudication takes about four to six weeks to complete, rather than the extended timetable for litigation, which can take up to 18 months to reach trial – allowing providers to avoid incurring heavy legal costs.
If the contractor is found liable by the adjudicator, housing providers have a strong negotiating position from which to secure the delivery of a remedial solution by the original contractor.
This is likely to be more cost-effective than paying the costs of engaging an alternative contractor.
Another strategy available to providers is the ‘work-now-argue-later’ approach.
In this strategy, the housing provider and original contractor enter into a binding contract for the delivery of remedial works, at no initial cost to the housing provider.
The question of liability and which party bears the costs is then resolved at the end, either by agreement or through adjudication.
As well as prioritising resident safety, this approach allows both parties to agree the cost of the remedial works at the outset, providing cost certainty.
This is in sharp contrast to many defects claims, where an alternative contractor is appointed to carry out remedial works while the provider attempts to recoup costs from the original contractor.
While less common, in practice, the ‘work-now-argue-later’ approach means that a remedial solution can commence swiftly and both parties can accurately forecast and pre-empt the financial implications of being found liable.
These two strategies can help to reduce the legal costs of pursuing a claim and any delays in implementing a remedial scheme – outcomes that fundamentally benefit social housing providers and their residents.
For more information
Please contact Kieran Binnie.
“Monitoring the Mental Health Act in 2018/19” published by the CQC, has found that although improvements have been made, healthcare services need to do more to comply with their human rights duties.
The IPPR North report says that this Parliament must be the “Devolution Parliament” to truly “level up” the country.
On 20 January 2020, the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) issued Advice for Building Owners of Multi-storey, Multi-occupied Residential Buildings.
The Society for Computers and Law (SCL) has introduced an Adjudication Scheme for IT Projects and Services.
The board of a housing services company was reportedly dismissed in December 2019 following the discovery of a variety of safety and hygiene issues in the properties they manage.
The Heat Network (Metering and Billing) Regulations 2014 (the Regulations) place certain responsibilities on anyone supplying and charging for heating, cooling or hot water (the heat supplier).
In our latest Company Secretary Update, we focus on the Queen’s Speech over Christmas and the recommendations and commitments in relation to housing.
So after two days of legal argument, the Supreme Court have now retired to reach their decision in the joined cases of Tomlinson-Blake v the Royal Mencap Society and Shannon v Rampersad.
Anthony Collins Solicitors has revealed details of its annual social impact, including advising on funding deals for building 19,603 new homes and setting up 90 new charities.
To receive invitations to our events, as well as information and articles on legal issues and sector developments that are of interest to you, please sign up to Newsroom.