The European Court has upheld the long-standing principle that parties to a dispute should be able to choose their lawyers without having to go through a tender process (or use a framework).
In addition to the final guidance on fees charged after the death of a resident, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has published draft advice to help care homes understand their wider obligations to residents, and prospective residents, under consumer law.
The CMA’s original market study was initially prompted by increasing concerns with cross-subsidies, hidden charges, confusing requests for top-ups, and whether common practices and contract terms treated customers unfairly. The draft advice makes no real comment on cross-subsidies and disappointingly, makes no criticism of the standard practice where public authorities pay a ‘shortfall’ of the true cost of care.
Throughout the draft advice, the CMA emphasises that customers are in a very vulnerable position when searching for a suitable care home. As a result, providers will have to go “the extra mile” to show they are acting ‘reasonably’ as the ‘average customer’ may be “frail and in poor health, and under a lot of pressure and emotional stress.”
The key principles outlined in the draft advice require providers to:
- provide sufficient information on their website, in welcome packs and ‘key facts’ documents so it can be considered in advance by a prospective resident;
- treat residents fairly, recognising that providers will often have a greater understanding of how the market operates in comparison with the average customer;
- deliver quality services; and
- handle complaints fairly and effectively.
Although these principles are commendable and we would expect to see them met in any quality service, the recommendations could significantly change the way many care homes operate in practice.
We know that most providers work tirelessly to provide quality services, in a market that is “on its knees”. Despite this, the draft advice heaps additional pressure on care homes to fill both the gulf in terms of a lack of information, and the gap in financial support that exists between individual customers and public authorities. These changes have been proposed, despite statutory obligations which already oblige public authorities to provide such support. Some of the CMA’s most important points cover:
- not allowing a resident to move in until a needs assessment has been carried out;
- ensuring the resident has had sufficient time to consider which services they want and to visit alternative homes;
- fixing care costs for the duration of the residents’ stay or only allowing increases by reference to a fixed sum or a relevant, objective and verifiable published price index;
- passing cost savings on to residents whether as a result of Funded Nursing Care, changes in the law or regulation or the resident’s reduced needs; and
- not terminating a placement until the customer has fallen into significant arrears (of 3 months or more).
The draft advice is lengthy but we recommend that you consider the impact the changes could have upon your own customer contracts and how you manage your admission processes. The guidance is available here and you have until 12 July 2018 to submit your comments before the advice is finalised.
If you would like us to review your contracts against the CMA’s proposals, or would be interested in purchasing a self-review tool to evaluate your compliance with consumer law, please contact Emma Watt or John Wearing.
 Where private payers are paying higher fees to subsidise the rates paid for publicly-funded residents when receiving the same services – equivalent to a ‘care tax’ of £8,000 a year per privately paying resident https://www.laingbuisson.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/LaingBuisson_Care_Cost_Benchmarks_8ed_PR.pdf
 Paragraph 1.2 of draft advice
On 8 July, news broke of the staggering fine of more than £183m the ICO intended to levy against British Airways as a result of a hack that took place in 2018, compromising 500,000 customers' data.
The Government has been refused permission to appeal a decision ruling that transitional arrangements in public sector pension schemes are discriminatory.
The Lifeline Project was a well-regarded charity. Failure to carry out the targets within the contracts led the charity into insolvency and resulted in a personal, 7-year disqualification order.
Many local authorities have assessed that a trading subsidiary or trading structure could be beneficial as part of generating income or the service delivery matrix.
On 23 July, trainees from Anthony Collins Solicitors will host an ‘experience day’, which will involve various activities and presentations, with lawyers and non-lawyers from across the firm.
The Office of the Immigration Services Commissioner (OISC) has launched a new scheme specifically for charities and not-for-profit organisations who want to advise EU citizens on UK settlement.
In the second part of our series on contract management pitfalls, we look at the risks and opportunities presented by payment mechanisms in construction contracts.
The Government has resurrected its plans to cap the termination payments for exiting employees in the public sector.
Under most construction contracts, the contractor takes on the ground conditions risk. However, a recent case has demonstrated that the risk can fall on the employer.
To receive invitations to our events, as well as information and articles on legal issues and sector developments that are of interest to you, please sign up to Newsroom.