Long running concerns over the future of Interserve – the largest public sector focused contractor and outsourcing firm – took a new twist on 15 March 2019.
Following the decision in the Court of Appeal last summer, (see our ebriefing) the Supreme Court has announced today, that Mencap’s leave to appeal this has been granted. Their Lordships will now deliberate on whether all time spent during sleep-ins count towards working time for the purposes of National Minimum Wage or, as the Court of Appeal decided, just time spent awake and working.
For those of us involved, be it in an advisory or operational capacity, this announcement, whilst prolonging the absence of a final answer is by no means unexpected (see our ebriefing). It was always unlikely that a matter with such huge cost implications for the care sector and significant impact for individual employees would be resolved without the Supreme Court getting to decide.
We have been informed by the Supreme Court that the hearing will not take place before October 2019, but the actual timetable is yet to be confirmed. With that in mind, we would advise care providers to take the following steps;
- Use the ongoing uncertainty caused by this in discussions with commissioners to seek to ensure that sufficient funding is provided to pay NMW for each hour of a sleep-in pending the Supreme Court’s decision;
- For those considering removing Top Ups consider whether any change should be delayed pending the decision of the Supreme Court. We recognise that commissioners funding decisions may drive decisions on Top Ups; and
- For those who have already removed Top Ups consider your risk management strategy in light of the potential for the Supreme Court to decide that every hour of a sleep-in counts.
For a case where so many people have a different view, it is difficult to second guess the results of the Supreme Court’s deliberations and predict an outcome. Our view is that the Court of Appeal rightly interpreted the wording of the NMW regulations in accordance with Parliament’s intentions when the Regulations were introduced. We would hope the Supreme Court will follow suit and leave it to parliament to consider whether the current National Minimum Wage Regulations give sufficient protection to workers carrying out sleep-ins.
We will, of course, provide any updates about the timetable for the case, but in the meantime, please do not hesitate to contact Matt Wort or another member of the employment team.
In a decision of the High Court, Mr Justice Spencer ruled that the “Right to Rent” scheme was discriminatory and violated the European Convention on Human Rights.
ACS was also shortlisted in a number of other categories, with its housing sector and procurement, projects and construction teams honoured in the awards’ Excellence in Client Service category.
At least 320,000 people are homeless in Britain, according to research by the housing charity Shelter.
A recent case has confirmed that a professional appointment for construction will usually be a “construction contract” under the Construction Act.
The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has recommended changes to the law and its regulatory powers, which are intended to safeguard the interests of consumers.
Behind the Wellbeing of Future Generations Act, there is an implicit admission: we haven’t been taking sufficient account of the interests of future generations.
“Frustration” enables a party to get out of a contract where new circumstances make performance of that contract impossible or illegal.
Chris Whittington will be speaking on 'Leading from the Centre' at The Diocese of Worcester's annual Governors' Conference.
Last week the Fundraising Regulator published the outcome of its investigation into the charity, ILA. The decision has important lessons for trustees of all charities.
To receive invitations to our events, as well as information and articles on legal issues and sector developments that are of interest to you, please sign up to Newsroom.