The European Court has upheld the long-standing principle that parties to a dispute should be able to choose their lawyers without having to go through a tender process (or use a framework).
Unison have lodged an application for permission to appeal to the Supreme Court in the Mencap case.
We expect that it will take at least 8 weeks for the Supreme Court to decide whether to grant permission to appeal. If permission is granted, the Supreme Court would then list the case for a hearing, which we would expect would be in the latter part of 2019. We will provide a further update on timings once further information is available. Our expectation is that the Supreme Court will give permission for the appeal to proceed to be considered at a hearing.
The grounds for appeal highlight the significance of the issue for the sector and for workers. They are technical in nature but are broadly based on argument that:
- The previous approach to the law was correct. The exemption regarding sleeping should only apply if someone is not already working because of the nature of the restrictions on them.
- The Low Pay Commission recommendations have been misunderstood. It is alleged they recommended time spent available for work should be paid at NMW rates.
- The Court of Appeal contradicted themselves by saying that the sleep-in exception was intended to deal “comprehensively” with the position of sleep-in workers, and then accepting the conclusion in the Scottbridge case which the Court of Appeal felt turned on its particular facts.
- The Court of Appeal were wrong to conclude that Walton (the case which upheld the use of Daily Average Agreements in a live in care context) was authority for the proposition that a worker on call who is permitted to sleep is not working.
- The Court of Appeal shouldn’t have changed the Tribunal’s original decision on its facts unless they concluded the original decision was perverse.
The Court of Appeal decision represents the current interpretation of the law, but this appeal means it cannot yet be taken to be the final position. Providers will be keeping a close eye on further developments to help decide future pay strategy for sleep-ins. We expect HMRC will be providing an update in respect of the SCCS scheme by 17 August and we will provide a further update once we have considered the HMRC update.
For more information
On 8 July, news broke of the staggering fine of more than £183m the ICO intended to levy against British Airways as a result of a hack that took place in 2018, compromising 500,000 customers' data.
The Government has been refused permission to appeal a decision ruling that transitional arrangements in public sector pension schemes are discriminatory.
The Lifeline Project was a well-regarded charity. Failure to carry out the targets within the contracts led the charity into insolvency and resulted in a personal, 7-year disqualification order.
Many local authorities have assessed that a trading subsidiary or trading structure could be beneficial as part of generating income or the service delivery matrix.
On 23 July, trainees from Anthony Collins Solicitors will host an ‘experience day’, which will involve various activities and presentations, with lawyers and non-lawyers from across the firm.
The Office of the Immigration Services Commissioner (OISC) has launched a new scheme specifically for charities and not-for-profit organisations who want to advise EU citizens on UK settlement.
In the second part of our series on contract management pitfalls, we look at the risks and opportunities presented by payment mechanisms in construction contracts.
The Government has resurrected its plans to cap the termination payments for exiting employees in the public sector.
Under most construction contracts, the contractor takes on the ground conditions risk. However, a recent case has demonstrated that the risk can fall on the employer.
To receive invitations to our events, as well as information and articles on legal issues and sector developments that are of interest to you, please sign up to Newsroom.